Skip to content

Research Paper On Cloud Computing Architecture Diagram

  • 1.

    Androutsellis-Theotokis, S., Spinellis, D.: A survey of peerto- peer content distribution technologies. ACM Comput. Surv. 36(4), 335–371 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Papazoglou, M.P., Heuvel, W.-J.: Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues. The VLDB Journal 16(3), 389–415 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Jin, X., Liu, J.: From individual based modeling to autonomy oriented computation. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds.) AUTONOMY 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2969, pp. 151–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 4.

    Olston, C., Reed, B., Srivastava, U., Kumar, R., Tomkins, A.: Pig latin: a not-so-foreign language for data processing. In: SIGMOD 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 1099–1110. ACM, New York (2008), Scholar

  • 5.

    Koh, Y., Knauerhase, R.C., Brett, P., Bowman, M., Wen, Z., Pu, C.: An analysis of performance interference effects in virtual environments. In: ISPASS, pp. 200–209. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Ghemawat, S., Gobioff, H., Leung, S.-T.: The google file system. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 37(5), 29–43 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Petersen, K., Spreitzer, M., Terry, D., Theimer, M.: Bayou: replicated database services for world-wide applications. In: EW 7: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on ACM SIGOPS European Workshop, pp. 275–280. ACM, New York (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 8.

    DeCandia, G., Hastorun, D., Jampani, M., Kakulapati, G., Lakshman, A., Pilchin, A., Sivasubramanian, S., Vosshall, P., Vogels, W.: Dynamo: amazon’s highly available key-value store. In: SOSP 2007, pp. 205–220. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Hanemann, A., Boote, J.W., Boyd, E.L., Durand, J., Kudarimoti, L., Łapacz, R., Swany, D.M., Trocha, S., Zurawski, J.: PerfSONAR: A service oriented architecture for multi-domain network monitoring. In: Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Traverso, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3826, pp. 241–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Smr, P., Novek, V.: Architecture acquisition for automatic building of scientific portals. In: SOFSEM 2006: 32nd Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, pp. 493–500. Springer, Heidelberg (2006), Scholar

  • 11.

    Chau, M., Huang, Z., Qin, J., Zhou, Y., Chen, H.: Building a scientific knowledge web portal: the nanoport experience. Decis. Support Syst. 42(2), 1216–1238 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 12.

    Christie, M., Marru, S.: The lead portal: a teragrid gateway and application service architecture: Research articles. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper. 19(6), 767–781 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 13.

    Plale, B., Rossi, A., Simmhan, Y., Sarangi, A., Slominski, A., Shirasauna, S., Thomas, T.: Building grid portal applications from a webservice component architecture. Proceedings of the IEEE (Special issue on Grid Computing) 93(3), 551–563 (2005)Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Stanley, M.: IBM ink utility computing deal,

  • 15.

    Appavoo, J., Uhlig, V., Waterland, A.: Project Kittyhawk: building a global-scale computer: Blue Gene/P as a generic computing platform. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 42(1), 77–84 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    Deelman, E., Singh, G., Livny, M., Berriman, B., Good, J.: The cost of doing science on the cloud: the montage example. In: SC 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing pp. 1–12. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2008)Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Defogging Cloud Computing: A Taxonomy (June 16, 2008),

  • 18.

    Cloud Services Continuum (July 3, 2008),

  • Please, wait while we are validating your browser